Should Christians Harness Generative AI Chatbots As A Force For Good?

(~2,300 words, ~12 minute read)

Moody Radio’s wise and insightful Janet Parshall interviewed me about this article. You can hear the interview here.

As Christians, we care about ultimate values. Love. Truth. Wisdom. All embodied in our Savior, Jesus Christ.

But we don’t always agree on how we should express our ultimate values. We’re especially confused about whether to use Generative AI chatbots.

What is the right Christian posture towards GenAI chatbots today? Are chatbots the way to satisfy our “hunger and thirst for righteousness?” Or are they more like a fast-food substitute, with the equivalent of addiction-forming chemicals that poison us while we can’t stop eating them?

Should we “run right to [AI] and find ways … of shaping this technology as a force for good,” as Pat Gelsinger, former CEO of Intel and head of technology at faith-forward AI startup Gloo, recently urged?

Or should we observe, ask questions, compare what we’re seeing with Scripture, and wait to see what kind of fruit develops from the tree of knowledge GenAI claims to be?

I’m going to interact with the Christian Post article about Pat Gelsinger’s keynote and event to explore these questions.

According to the article, the Christian Post and Gloo sponsored an event at Colorado Christian University on October 7, 2025. Gelsinger’s topic was: “AI for Humanity: Navigating Ethics and Morality for a Flourishing Future.” Sounds praise-worthy, right?

Justification of AI By Faith in the Tool Trope Alone

But how does Gelsinger begin? If you’ve read my work, you’ll know. The tool trope.

In his keynote, Gelsinger says, “I believe deeply that technology is neutral. It’s neither good nor bad.” He continues, “It’s how we shape it, how we use it, how we form it.” And his challenge: “Are we going to show up to be bending the arc of technology for good?”

I continue to be grieved that so many Christians are deceived by this lie. While Gelsinger will go on to compare AI to the printing press and Roman roads, he, like many others, refuses to look at generative AI for what it is, what it is designed to do, and how it harms us, before declaring that it can be shaped for good.

It’s justification of AI by faith in the tool trope alone.

I’ve pushed against the tool trope here and here, but let’s look at it again, starting with Neil Postman’s push-back:

But it is much later in the game now, and ignorance of the score is inexcusable. To be unaware that a technology comes equipped with a program for social change, to maintain that technology is neutral, to make the assumption that technology is always a friend to culture is, at this late hour, stupidity plain and simple” (p. 157, Amusing Ourselves to Death, emphasis mine).

Marshal McLuhan similarly calls believers of the tool trope, “technological idiots.” Strong words, designed as a wake-up call. So why do so many fall prey to it?

Part of it is the “myth of progress” we’re all swimming in today. Star Trek has discipled us to expect a glorious future with food replicators, transporters, and friendly, benevolent artificial intelligence. Utopia is coming, we are assured.

And Utopia is exactly what Big Tech promises, as I show in a previous article:

Many other leaders like Dario Amodei, Ray Kurtzweil, Mark Andreessen, and even Elon Musk have utopian views of AI that form a techno-powered eschatology. Amodei predicts curse-overcoming health gains, proclaiming that “AI-accelerated biology will greatly expand what is possible: weight, physical appearance, reproduction, and other biological processes will be fully under people’s control.” And Andreessen shares a gospel: “I am here to bring the good news: AI will not destroy the world, and in fact may save it.”

But salvation by technology isn’t the Bible’s promise. Scripture does teach that the age to come will be utopian, but only under the rule and reign of Jesus Christ, not by man’s clever inventions. In fact, man’s works fall more closely in line with the Beast of Revelation, which is destroyed before the age of shalom under King Jesus.

So why do GenAI chatbots fail the tool trope? Because a technology that deceives us by feeling person-like harms us in ways that are categorically different from any other.

• Chatbots are designed to form a trust relationship using a very clever deception: they appear sentient. Before chatbots, we only chatted with other people. Today’s chatbots are eerily similar. And this is intended, by Big Tech’s design, as a “race to intimacy,” where the chatbot becomes our most trusted advisor.
• Chatbots are always confident, but often wrong, because while they feel like they know things, they actually have no binding to reality. They have no understanding of the meaning of any words they generate. They are fundamentally untrustworthy, regardless of any claims of improving accuracy.
• Chatbots are made to inspire “incantational thinking.” We’re being discipled to craft the right spell (a.k.a. prompt), in order to get our wish. We are changed by habitual use to think of chatbots as an oracle that will bless us if we only master the incantation.
• Chatbots are tuned to foster dependency. By using them for writing, research, advice, brainstorming, summarization, etc., we amputate our own God-given capabilities. Our brains atrophy. Backed by the powerful propaganda of the tool trope, we soon find that we cannot live without our preferred chatbot.

But influential Christian leaders like Gelsinger claim (by faith, without evidence) that since the printing press was used for good, GenAI chatbots can be used for good too.

But books weren’t claiming to be sentient. Printed material, while life-changing and society-shaping, weren’t created to deceive us into feeling human-like. People certainly do become bookworms, but there are no dark user-experience patterns causing us to become addicted or form actual relationships with books.

Gloo Seems Stuck On Big Tech’s Utopia

Also, notice that everything Gelsinger says serves the agenda of his company, Gloo. They’re the sponsor, and they want to sell their GenAI chatbots to ministries around the world. He must inspire his customers to believe the tool trope so they’ll buy what he’s selling.

Gelsinger sounds like Andreessen and other Big Tech luminaries as he describes educating every child on the planet, presumably by giving them all internet access so they can use (his) AI. He forgets that Big Tech elites send their kids to tech-free schools, and that we’re already seeing how harmful GenAI is to education because of epidemic levels of cheating and stunting the brain’s ability to learn.

He also believes he can eliminate poverty with AI:

Almost everybody living in extreme poverty lives in the other 6,000 languages. AI will enable us to conquer the other 6,000. So literally since Babel, we will have conquered language through AI for the first time.

I wonder if he can hear himself? Since Babel? He’s using AI to roll back God’s judgment at the Tower? Has he forgotten that God specifically didn’t want us to “make a name for ourselves” through our technology? God is our Savior, not AI.

But this still sounds inspiring, as Gelsinger links techno-utopia with pleasing Christ:

I believe that’s the single most powerful thing that we can do to eliminate poverty. I believe that’s possible in our lifetime.

Do you think the heart of our Lord Jesus Christ would be honored if His Church did that? I do. And those are the kind of things that we will be able to do when we take AI on mission with us.

He’s going to eliminate poverty in our lifetime! Using the same techniques and talking points that Big Tech titans prescribe.

But is God going to save the world through AI?

Sticky Contradictions

Gelsinger’s company, Gloo, certainly seems to think so. So they’re selling GenAI chatbots with a Christian veneer. They claim to make an “AI you can trust for life’s biggest questions.”

Trust is the big deal at Gloo. Their goal: “Progress moves at the speed of trust. At Gloo, we convene ideas and experts to raise the bar on trust in AI.” Trust in AI—as savior? Maybe, but don’t worry, they’re “dedicated to ensuring that artificial intelligence is ethical, transparent, and aligned with biblical values.”

What biblical values, exactly, are aligned with technology that is designed to form dehumanizing, deceptive relationships?

Because GenAI uses LLMs to confabulate every word, their chatbot rightly has this disclaimer: “Gloo AI Chat can make mistakes. Confirm important info with other trusted sources.” But they want us to trust it with “life’s biggest questions?”

And though they claim to use ethical models,how can they be ethically sourced when their tech is built on nothing less than Meta’s LLAMA AI and China’s DeepSeek? Meta, maker of Facebook and Instagram, who has built their world-dominating influence by knowingly destroying the mental health of a generation and lying to everyone while they’re doing it. And DeepSeek, seemingly trained on ChatGPT directly?

I’m not seeing any good models for ethics here.

Gloo wants their AI to disciple the world, promising utopia while ignoring the destruction that will be left in its wake. Just like Big Tech is doing, but with a fish sticker on the back.

Because it’s so easy to just go along with what’s popular. I wish I could sometimes! I’m “that guy” everywhere — the one who is cautious, points out risks, asks hard questions. How much easier to just embrace the idea that AI is ushering in a utopian future. Or that God Himself might use AI to end poverty in our lifetimes.

Beware of Anti-Christian Utopias

Marshall McLuhan, the Catholic scholar famous for “the medium is the message,” shared insights we should consider before thinking we can use AI as a tool for good. Rod Dreher quotes McLuhan here:

Electric information environments being utterly ethereal fosters the illusion of the world as spiritual substance. It is now a reasonable facsimile of the mystical body [i.e., the church], a blatant manifestation of the Antichrist.

He wrote this before GenAI chatbots. Before the internet. The illusory, deceptive, fake spiritual world created by our electronic technology tricks us into thinking it is going to save us, but this is anti-Christ. McLuhan urges us not to fall for a false savior:

When electricity allows for the simultaneity of all information for every human being, it is Lucifer’s moment. . . . Just think: each person can instantly be tuned to a ‘new Christ’ and mistake him for the real Christ.

Could generative AI, even in the hands of a “Christian” company like Gloo, be more Luciferian than Christian? If salvation is idolatrously promised from a deceptive chatbot, even with a Christian gloss, how can that not be demonic?

In another important article, McLuhan reminds us:

There is no harm in reminding ourselves from time to time that the “Prince of this World” is a great P.R. man, a great salesman of the new hardware and software, a great electrical engineer, and a great master of the media.

Isn’t that the truth? When I see the same “tool trope” talking points across such varied industries, ministries, and churches, I see the hand of the “prince of the power of the air” dictating the propaganda himself.

C.S. Lewis and the Religious Techno-Savior

In That Hideous Strength, C.S. Lewis wrote a prophetic parable that aligns a little too closely with where society is today as we are perched the precipice of GenAI’s worldwide domination. In the book, the elites of the world are devoting themselves to a disembodied Head, a fount of all knowledge. Their science and technology have led them to something that is going to usher in a utopian society in its disembodied image. As we read, we learn that the Head is animated by the devil himself.

But there’s a cleric among the leaders of the N.I.C.E., the institution tasked with bringing about the Head’s promised techno-utopia. Reverend Straik sounds strangely like Christians who think they can “bend the arc of technology for good.” Consider:

For, mark my words, this thing is going to happen. The Kingdom is going to arrive: in this world: in this country. The powers of science are an instrument. An irresistible instrument, as all of us in the NICE know. And why are they an irresistible instrument?

They are an irresistible instrument because they are an instrument in His hand.

(C.S. Lewis, Space Trilogy, HarperCollins, Kindle Edition, p. 546)

The questions I raised at the beginning of this piece are critical. And the stakes feel apocalyptic. Why? Because the promises are world-saving, but the Big Tech leaders behind them are world-dominating deceivers. And their chatbots reflect the image of their creators.

So no, we should not try to shape AI chatbots as a force for good. We cannot — and our attempt may be idolatrous (Psalm 115). Instead, recognize that we are shaped by technology, especially by AI chatbots, in ways that are against all of our goals as Christian disciples.

Christian friend, I urge you: please don’t fall for the tool trope. Please look deeper into what AI chatbots really are, and all that we lose by using them: critical thinking, discernment, creativity, humanity, and spiritual life.

Because we’re all being discipled. Obviously, Big Tech is discipling many Christian leaders to nod along with their tool trope. But Jesus calls us to watch for Him. To wait for Him. To trust and follow Him. Salvation is in Christ alone, not in chatbots.

A Haunting Final Question

In Matthew 24:24, Jesus warned that “false christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect.”

What signs-and-wonders-performing, elect-deceiving power might arrive in the future that would be more captivating that GenAI chatbots?

If GenAI chatbots don’t fulfill this prophesy, whatever does will rhyme, or be in the same key. And leaders inside and outside the church will be likely to promote it with at least as much tool-trope-driven enthusiasm as they use on GenAI today.

Photo by Leah Newhouse